​CoVid Vaccines – A (Un)Scientific Outlook…

I got this message from one of my clients that read "Dear mam, I'm seeing lots of active persons between 50 to 65 ages are getting expired due to sudden massive heart attack without any symptoms before... I suspect recent vaxs...2 of My uncles expired in the same pattern... only thing is they are vaccinated"

Today this virus is considered and declared a flu which needs booster flu doses. That’s a mask off - No virus that needs a vax can ever become weak to become a flu. It should always need the same precaution or more especially since it gets resistant to countering force like a drug. Besides I have treated multiple people in the last few months – women having severe bleeding, people (previously with excellent immunity) having lower immunity, women who lost babies to miscarriage – having one common factor – they had taken the vaccine.

AIM (Awaken India Movement) is an organization that is tirelessly collecting data from across all channels of deaths and adverse drug reactions which have not been filed by authorities. AIM has collected data of close to 32000 + deaths in the last 12 months - all supposedly healthy people with no previous medical history.  Perhaps all these are freak incident? And now a similar trend of deaths of children since that drive has begun beginning of this year. 

A scientific mind is one that stops to look for patterns and investigates - not just dismisses. Let us assume even 70% of them were just incidental. Surely 100% cannot be incidental. How can so many entire families sudden turn so ill after vaccination – we are talking about people who had no health issues before being vaccinated.

We can argue here that there is no need to establish a cause but we surely can investigate and try to verify the information rather than looking the other way and dismissing it.  

The issue is that the harm of any pharmaceutical chemical concoction can never be established if you are going to keep looking at one factor "did A cause B". If I make a vaccine for A disease, if I keep looking for did it cause A and if it didn’t, I count that as success. This is not science. That vaccine may not cause A but may cause B to Z. The problem is B to Z is going to be called what most argue "when something untoward happens, families are always looking for some rationale, they might blame anything"

When we wish to adhere to a scientific rigor, we must be open to listening, discussion, debate and experimentation and research with no bias from skepticism, greed of money, power, and politics. The BIG FACTORS - DISCRIMINATION and HIGH HANDEDNESS - none of these are science.  That is why I say there is no science & reason without the Spiritual Sciences & Wisdom.
​
But the so called 'science' has shunned away with the spirit for a reason isn’t it. How do we support this blind approach? It is not that our eyes cannot see but our hearts are blind to the obvious truth. We should be looking at multiple research articles that compare many modalities of treatments with no fear of outcome. We want to believe that science is neutral to investigation.  And honest science is one that is willing to observe and pick the most efficacious treatment. The current system looks down on all other modalities of natural medicine by claiming it has no scientific research. Have we stopped to question why we don’t have research and who stops us from investigating? If we look deeper, this is not about lack of research but this is about not wanting to research for fear of being compared. If the system is so robust then why there is a lack of trust in their own system. 

A true athlete is not afraid of a race.
​
I always say every treatment modality has its place in the system. We need to collaborate, investigate and work together with wisdom and maturity - not base ourselves on some bias and discrimination that represents only low self-esteem.